When does probation start if defendant was absent at sentencing?
Q. If the defendant was absent and skipped his sentencing at court, but the judge sentenced him to probation anyway, when does it start? Can the probation conclude before the defendant ever actually knew about it, even if he didn't report in, if it starts at sentencing? Thanks.
Asked by Julie - Tue Jun 2 09:51:14 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. It starts at sentencing. They should give the defendant a call saying that hes been ordered on probation right after.
Answered by Ruby - Tue Jun 2 11:41:30 2009
Q. If the defendant was absent and skipped his sentencing at court, but the judge sentenced him to probation anyway, when does it start? Can the probation conclude before the defendant ever actually knew about it, even if he didn't report in, if it starts at sentencing? Thanks.
Asked by Julie - Tue Jun 2 09:51:14 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. It starts at sentencing. They should give the defendant a call saying that hes been ordered on probation right after.
Answered by Ruby - Tue Jun 2 11:41:30 2009
What would happen if a defendant confesses to being guilty during a trial?
Q. If a defendant were to be called to the stand as a witness and then eventually confess during examination, what would happen to him/her?
Asked by Matt J - Mon Jun 8 18:45:40 2009 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Either he would take a plea (if one is offered) or hopefully he would be found guilty by the jury. A judge cannot direct a guilty verdict.
Answered by Lexie - Mon Jun 8 18:49:35 2009
Q. If a defendant were to be called to the stand as a witness and then eventually confess during examination, what would happen to him/her?
Asked by Matt J - Mon Jun 8 18:45:40 2009 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Either he would take a plea (if one is offered) or hopefully he would be found guilty by the jury. A judge cannot direct a guilty verdict.
Answered by Lexie - Mon Jun 8 18:49:35 2009
What is the court case involving a misidentified defendant?
Q. I know of a court case (could have happened more than once but I just need one example) in which the witness misidentifies the defendant. The lawyer uses another person as the defendant while the witness says that that person is the criminal for sure. However, the defending attorney calls in the real defendent and shows that her eyewitness testimony is wrong. Does anyone know which case this is or where I can find a summary on the internet?
Asked by Kaykins - Sun Jul 26 19:31:14 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. You could be talking about the often referenced case from Illinois in 1994. The case is called PEOPLE V. SIMAC It's legal citation is People v. Simac 641 N.E. 2d 416 In this case, the defendant is on trial for criminal vehicular offenses (I think leaving the scene of serious injury & failure to yield). In court, the defense attorney (Sotomayer) had his client seated behind him & NOT at the counsel table next to him (as is customary). Instead, he had one of his law firm clerks (who had similar features as the defendant) sit beside him. The only eyewitness called & asked to identify the driver of the car was the police officer that was at the original accident scene. This officer, identified the law lcerk sitting next to the defense lawyer… [cont.]
Answered by Lawsklnow - Tue Jul 28 18:06:36 2009
Q. I know of a court case (could have happened more than once but I just need one example) in which the witness misidentifies the defendant. The lawyer uses another person as the defendant while the witness says that that person is the criminal for sure. However, the defending attorney calls in the real defendent and shows that her eyewitness testimony is wrong. Does anyone know which case this is or where I can find a summary on the internet?
Asked by Kaykins - Sun Jul 26 19:31:14 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. You could be talking about the often referenced case from Illinois in 1994. The case is called PEOPLE V. SIMAC It's legal citation is People v. Simac 641 N.E. 2d 416 In this case, the defendant is on trial for criminal vehicular offenses (I think leaving the scene of serious injury & failure to yield). In court, the defense attorney (Sotomayer) had his client seated behind him & NOT at the counsel table next to him (as is customary). Instead, he had one of his law firm clerks (who had similar features as the defendant) sit beside him. The only eyewitness called & asked to identify the driver of the car was the police officer that was at the original accident scene. This officer, identified the law lcerk sitting next to the defense lawyer… [cont.]
Answered by Lawsklnow - Tue Jul 28 18:06:36 2009
What would happen to a defendant if they did not take action in responding to a complaint in a civil suit?
Q. Say they don't reply to a summon and don't submit an answer, just completely don't follow through, what could happen to the defendant? I am just trying to confirm my thoughts on this for an assignment lol, I'm not in any trouble here. Thank you all.
Asked by mda - Wed Oct 24 15:47:15 2007 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. The defendant will lose the case. The plaintiff will petition the court for a default judgment and will get the default judgment. It will then be up to the plaintiff to collect the judgment amount from the defendant.
Answered by regerugged - Wed Oct 24 15:51:08 2007
Q. Say they don't reply to a summon and don't submit an answer, just completely don't follow through, what could happen to the defendant? I am just trying to confirm my thoughts on this for an assignment lol, I'm not in any trouble here. Thank you all.
Asked by mda - Wed Oct 24 15:47:15 2007 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. The defendant will lose the case. The plaintiff will petition the court for a default judgment and will get the default judgment. It will then be up to the plaintiff to collect the judgment amount from the defendant.
Answered by regerugged - Wed Oct 24 15:51:08 2007
When a defendant in a civil case wished to challenge the courts personal or subject matter jurisdiction over?
Q. When a defendant in a civil case wishes to challenge the courts personal or subject matter jurisdiction over him, he should enter a plea of not guilty Tor F.
Asked by Princess - Sun Oct 18 02:32:38 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. TRUE
Answered by Romey - Sun Oct 18 02:57:33 2009
Q. When a defendant in a civil case wishes to challenge the courts personal or subject matter jurisdiction over him, he should enter a plea of not guilty Tor F.
Asked by Princess - Sun Oct 18 02:32:38 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. TRUE
Answered by Romey - Sun Oct 18 02:57:33 2009
How can i get a judicial order preventing a defendant from making further applications in court?
Q. I won my case in court, but he keeps appealing every time i try to enforce the enforcement. I've been told the court has to keep accepting his appeal in the absence of any judicial order preventing the defendant from making further applications.
Asked by angie b - Wed Mar 26 17:59:41 2008 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. If you won your case you have a judgement in your favour.That cannot be overturned unless it is set aside on appeal (or your opponent is given a stay of execution pending appeal) Whichever court system you are involved in will have its own appeal system which will eventually be exhausted i.e there will come a point where there is no new court to appeal to. Technically you cannot really "appeal" against an enforcement process. All you can do is apply to the Court for a variation of the terms of the judgement - a stay of execution - more time to pay - a reduction in instalments ordered to be paid etc. etc. Court staff must allow defendants to enter these applications They are not judges and cannot make any decisions on whether the… [cont.]
Answered by waldo_mcginty - Thu Mar 27 04:57:35 2008
Q. I won my case in court, but he keeps appealing every time i try to enforce the enforcement. I've been told the court has to keep accepting his appeal in the absence of any judicial order preventing the defendant from making further applications.
Asked by angie b - Wed Mar 26 17:59:41 2008 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. If you won your case you have a judgement in your favour.That cannot be overturned unless it is set aside on appeal (or your opponent is given a stay of execution pending appeal) Whichever court system you are involved in will have its own appeal system which will eventually be exhausted i.e there will come a point where there is no new court to appeal to. Technically you cannot really "appeal" against an enforcement process. All you can do is apply to the Court for a variation of the terms of the judgement - a stay of execution - more time to pay - a reduction in instalments ordered to be paid etc. etc. Court staff must allow defendants to enter these applications They are not judges and cannot make any decisions on whether the… [cont.]
Answered by waldo_mcginty - Thu Mar 27 04:57:35 2008
Can a default judgment against one defendant be used to get judgment against the second defendant?
Q. I live in Florida and I am involved in a civil action (foreclosure). I answered the complaint within the allocated time and so did my HOA. But the other defendant in my case: an insurance company that has a small lien on my property did not answer. Today I find out that the plaintiff' attorney (bank) filed for a default motion and a motion for summary judgment against me. Is this legal and can it be fought, given that I have showed good faith in attempting to litigate this complaint?
Asked by KJ4 - Tue Mar 17 07:55:41 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I am making some guesses about your case, you really need to talk to an attorney about this. But, it sounds like there are 2 things happening simultaneously. First, the motion for default against the insurance company won't affect your case. The plaintiff's attorney is asking the court to enter default judgment against that defendant since they didn't file an answer. That's probably not a big deal, since the only thing at issue for that defendant was whether their lien was junior to the lien being foreclosed, and they probably wouldn't have much reason to contest that. The other issue is the motion for summary judgment against you. A summary judgment is granted when there are no material disputes about the facts. The court then… [cont.]
Answered by J P - Fri Mar 20 13:43:39 2009
Q. I live in Florida and I am involved in a civil action (foreclosure). I answered the complaint within the allocated time and so did my HOA. But the other defendant in my case: an insurance company that has a small lien on my property did not answer. Today I find out that the plaintiff' attorney (bank) filed for a default motion and a motion for summary judgment against me. Is this legal and can it be fought, given that I have showed good faith in attempting to litigate this complaint?
Asked by KJ4 - Tue Mar 17 07:55:41 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I am making some guesses about your case, you really need to talk to an attorney about this. But, it sounds like there are 2 things happening simultaneously. First, the motion for default against the insurance company won't affect your case. The plaintiff's attorney is asking the court to enter default judgment against that defendant since they didn't file an answer. That's probably not a big deal, since the only thing at issue for that defendant was whether their lien was junior to the lien being foreclosed, and they probably wouldn't have much reason to contest that. The other issue is the motion for summary judgment against you. A summary judgment is granted when there are no material disputes about the facts. The court then… [cont.]
Answered by J P - Fri Mar 20 13:43:39 2009
"The defendant is to pay the applicants costs of this motion as assessed or agreed" What does this mean?
Q. Does it mean that the defendant has to pay the amount of money that the applicant used to go to court? Or does it mean that the defendant has to pay for the agreed cost of the item associated with the case.
Asked by MidnightDoll - Mon Mar 16 06:18:39 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. It means the defendant must pay the disputed sum of money PLUS all & any additional monies the applicant paid to bring the case to Court (legal costs, transportation, lost earnings, etc...)...
Answered by Beau.Gus - Mon Mar 16 06:27:36 2009
Q. Does it mean that the defendant has to pay the amount of money that the applicant used to go to court? Or does it mean that the defendant has to pay for the agreed cost of the item associated with the case.
Asked by MidnightDoll - Mon Mar 16 06:18:39 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. It means the defendant must pay the disputed sum of money PLUS all & any additional monies the applicant paid to bring the case to Court (legal costs, transportation, lost earnings, etc...)...
Answered by Beau.Gus - Mon Mar 16 06:27:36 2009
Does a defendant in a criminal case have a legal right to confront there accussers, and ask them quesions?
Q. I was wondering, Does a defendant in a civil case have a legal right to confront there accusers, and ASK them questions. I am a defendant in a criminal proceeding, and I was going to confront my accusers and ask them questions in the form of a deposition proceeding. Can I do this, and is that legal?
Asked by shoe1diva - Mon Dec 22 00:39:03 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. There are some limitations, but generally you are entitled to that as a matter of law.
Answered by Scott K - Mon Dec 22 01:07:55 2008
Q. I was wondering, Does a defendant in a civil case have a legal right to confront there accusers, and ASK them questions. I am a defendant in a criminal proceeding, and I was going to confront my accusers and ask them questions in the form of a deposition proceeding. Can I do this, and is that legal?
Asked by shoe1diva - Mon Dec 22 00:39:03 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. There are some limitations, but generally you are entitled to that as a matter of law.
Answered by Scott K - Mon Dec 22 01:07:55 2008
Would you testify against the defendant salacious crumb when he goes to trial ?
Q. Stabler and Benson and The Captain and Fin are currently outside of salacious crumb's apartment, getting ready to arrest him. District Attorney Alexandra Cabot needs witnesses to testify the defendant. Would you like to testify against him ?
Asked by John Munch - Wed Apr 21 14:18:03 2010 - - 15 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Can I frisk him?
Answered by Dr. Dekay Cynic - Wed Apr 21 14:22:30 2010
Q. Stabler and Benson and The Captain and Fin are currently outside of salacious crumb's apartment, getting ready to arrest him. District Attorney Alexandra Cabot needs witnesses to testify the defendant. Would you like to testify against him ?
Asked by John Munch - Wed Apr 21 14:18:03 2010 - - 15 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Can I frisk him?
Answered by Dr. Dekay Cynic - Wed Apr 21 14:22:30 2010
What would be your verdict if the defendant murdered the jurors of a previous trial for their verdict?
Q. If you were a juror in a trial where the defendant is charged with the murders of the jurors of a previous trial who doubted his innocence in another murder case, then would you still risk your life and give a guilty verdict?
Asked by Nero T. Pickle - Tue Sep 1 11:28:18 2009 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Hahahahaha. Yes, guilty. Have to get him off the street and locked up.
Answered by Irish - Tue Sep 1 11:32:53 2009
Q. If you were a juror in a trial where the defendant is charged with the murders of the jurors of a previous trial who doubted his innocence in another murder case, then would you still risk your life and give a guilty verdict?
Asked by Nero T. Pickle - Tue Sep 1 11:28:18 2009 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Hahahahaha. Yes, guilty. Have to get him off the street and locked up.
Answered by Irish - Tue Sep 1 11:32:53 2009
Can a defendant in a court martial defend themselves?
Q. Can the defendant in a Court Martial have the ability to Defend themselves in the United States?
Asked by Sooprazn - Thu Feb 18 19:31:17 2010 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Actually, they can only do so in very limited circumstances and where permitted by the judge. They must accept the JAG officer appointed to represent them.
Answered by cyanne2ak - Thu Feb 18 19:34:16 2010
Q. Can the defendant in a Court Martial have the ability to Defend themselves in the United States?
Asked by Sooprazn - Thu Feb 18 19:31:17 2010 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Actually, they can only do so in very limited circumstances and where permitted by the judge. They must accept the JAG officer appointed to represent them.
Answered by cyanne2ak - Thu Feb 18 19:34:16 2010
Why does a criminal defendant need a court's permission to present a defense theory to a jury?
Q. Sometimes I read where a court refused to allow a defendant to present a certain theory to a jury. Why can't the person present any theory they want and let the jury sort it out?
Asked by nightkey5 - Thu Sep 3 09:26:54 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. The defendant cannot present anything that involves inadmissible evidence. Hearsay, for instance. The job of the judge is to make sure that the jury only hears what evidence is legally permitted, because they are not qualified to judge the verity of certain types of evidence, and allowing it would be prejudicial. The defendant also can't present a theory that blames others without evidence, since to do so could be libellous. A defendant can present ALMOST anything he wants, but not absolutely every crackpot idea.
Answered by Quizzard - Thu Sep 3 09:33:54 2009
Q. Sometimes I read where a court refused to allow a defendant to present a certain theory to a jury. Why can't the person present any theory they want and let the jury sort it out?
Asked by nightkey5 - Thu Sep 3 09:26:54 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. The defendant cannot present anything that involves inadmissible evidence. Hearsay, for instance. The job of the judge is to make sure that the jury only hears what evidence is legally permitted, because they are not qualified to judge the verity of certain types of evidence, and allowing it would be prejudicial. The defendant also can't present a theory that blames others without evidence, since to do so could be libellous. A defendant can present ALMOST anything he wants, but not absolutely every crackpot idea.
Answered by Quizzard - Thu Sep 3 09:33:54 2009
Do judges ever order the defendant removed from the room for bad behavior?
Q. If the defendant is out of control? These answers are informative. It does raise the question of whether the judge chooses removal or just a contempt in court charge or both, and what if they defendant is simply arguing with the judge heatedly and insulting him or having a smart mouth.
Asked by whitetop94538 - Sun Oct 21 11:09:09 2007 - - 19 Answers - 0 Comments
A. A judge can do pretty much anything he wants in the courtroom over which he is presiding. He/she would be reluctant to have the defendant removed simply because it may be interfering with defendants rights to a fair trial and could be possible grounds for an appeal. But it is done. The most famous example would probably be the Charles Manson murder case. Manson and his girls (on trial at the same time) were constantly interrupting the proceedings with verbal outbursts. The judge kept having them removed for the day, but would allow them back the next day. Then one day, Manson actually made an effort to attack the judge. The judge had him removed permanently to a cell where he watched the rest of the case on closed circuit TV. The judge… [cont.]
Answered by Knowitall - Sun Oct 21 11:31:47 2007
Q. If the defendant is out of control? These answers are informative. It does raise the question of whether the judge chooses removal or just a contempt in court charge or both, and what if they defendant is simply arguing with the judge heatedly and insulting him or having a smart mouth.
Asked by whitetop94538 - Sun Oct 21 11:09:09 2007 - - 19 Answers - 0 Comments
A. A judge can do pretty much anything he wants in the courtroom over which he is presiding. He/she would be reluctant to have the defendant removed simply because it may be interfering with defendants rights to a fair trial and could be possible grounds for an appeal. But it is done. The most famous example would probably be the Charles Manson murder case. Manson and his girls (on trial at the same time) were constantly interrupting the proceedings with verbal outbursts. The judge kept having them removed for the day, but would allow them back the next day. Then one day, Manson actually made an effort to attack the judge. The judge had him removed permanently to a cell where he watched the rest of the case on closed circuit TV. The judge… [cont.]
Answered by Knowitall - Sun Oct 21 11:31:47 2007
For CT divorce does the defendant have to appear at the case management hearing?
Q. I am the defendant, the divorce is uncontested. The plaintiff's lawyer will not send me the case mgmt agreement to sign before so I don't have to go to the hearing. Anything I can do?
Asked by Brian S - Thu Oct 23 16:49:33 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Hire an attorney and go to the hearing, trust me on this...
Answered by Rose Garden - Thu Oct 23 16:54:18 2008
Q. I am the defendant, the divorce is uncontested. The plaintiff's lawyer will not send me the case mgmt agreement to sign before so I don't have to go to the hearing. Anything I can do?
Asked by Brian S - Thu Oct 23 16:49:33 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Hire an attorney and go to the hearing, trust me on this...
Answered by Rose Garden - Thu Oct 23 16:54:18 2008
What is the approriate form cause of action against an insurance company that won't indemnify a defendant?
Q. A defendant is being sued in federal court and contends that his insurance company should be paying for the litigation as well as any potential award. What is the approriate action against the insurance company? Do you file an interpleader action to join the insurance company to the existing case, do you seek a declaratory judgment against the insurer in a separate action, or is there a third option I'm not considering?
Asked by Rob - Fri Oct 12 10:51:12 2007 - - 1 Answers - 1 Comments
A. It depends - are you the plaintiff or the defendant? I assume you are the defendant. You cannot file an interpleader - that would only be the option for a third person/entity who is not currently a party to the lawsuit and wants to be a party to the lawsuit. You have two options: 1. File a complaint for breach of contract and declaratory relief (and ask for the two actions to be consolidated); OR 2. File a cross-complaint for breach of contract (you have a contract with the insurance company) and declaratory relief. In either option, you have to determine whether there is diversity of citizenship between the parties (everyone is a citizen of a different state and for the insurance company - its place of incorporation or principal… [cont.]
Answered by Princess Leia - Sat Oct 13 20:49:35 2007
Q. A defendant is being sued in federal court and contends that his insurance company should be paying for the litigation as well as any potential award. What is the approriate action against the insurance company? Do you file an interpleader action to join the insurance company to the existing case, do you seek a declaratory judgment against the insurer in a separate action, or is there a third option I'm not considering?
Asked by Rob - Fri Oct 12 10:51:12 2007 - - 1 Answers - 1 Comments
A. It depends - are you the plaintiff or the defendant? I assume you are the defendant. You cannot file an interpleader - that would only be the option for a third person/entity who is not currently a party to the lawsuit and wants to be a party to the lawsuit. You have two options: 1. File a complaint for breach of contract and declaratory relief (and ask for the two actions to be consolidated); OR 2. File a cross-complaint for breach of contract (you have a contract with the insurance company) and declaratory relief. In either option, you have to determine whether there is diversity of citizenship between the parties (everyone is a citizen of a different state and for the insurance company - its place of incorporation or principal… [cont.]
Answered by Princess Leia - Sat Oct 13 20:49:35 2007
Could a court issue a forensic psychologist to evaluate a defendant at their home?
Q. Does the court have the authority to appoint a forensic psychologist to evaluate the defendant at their residence if it is in safe circumstances? They normally work in the court itself or in a special facility with the defendant, but I just wanted to know if the above is possible given special circumstances and the case called for it.
Asked by Jared P - Sun Aug 2 13:00:12 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Of course it is POSSIBLE. I doubt it would ever happen unless the person was medically unable to leave the home. In such a case, I doubt it would be necessary.
Answered by STEVEN F - Sun Aug 2 13:24:59 2009
Q. Does the court have the authority to appoint a forensic psychologist to evaluate the defendant at their residence if it is in safe circumstances? They normally work in the court itself or in a special facility with the defendant, but I just wanted to know if the above is possible given special circumstances and the case called for it.
Asked by Jared P - Sun Aug 2 13:00:12 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Of course it is POSSIBLE. I doubt it would ever happen unless the person was medically unable to leave the home. In such a case, I doubt it would be necessary.
Answered by STEVEN F - Sun Aug 2 13:24:59 2009
What are some sample questions to ask a witness (prosecuting) to prove the defendant is innocent?
Q. Witness's story: was going to the bathroom 10th period, saw her friend on crutches going up the steps. She decides to help her by carrying her books. When she gets up the steps she see's the defendant walking briskly away from a vandalized locker (spraypainted) with paint on his shirt. She is accusing him of spray painting the locker. nobody actually saw the defendant vandalize the locker.
Asked by Dylan - Thu May 14 02:26:59 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Do you know the defendant? Have you ever been acquainted with the defendant. Did you see the defendants shirt before this alleged incident? Do you always take note of peoples clothes? (now go Perry Mason) have a person walk in and turn around that is wearing a sport coat, ask the witness to describe the shirt/blouse that that person is wearing. The defense rests. .
Answered by Lawn Gnome - Thu May 14 02:44:47 2009
Q. Witness's story: was going to the bathroom 10th period, saw her friend on crutches going up the steps. She decides to help her by carrying her books. When she gets up the steps she see's the defendant walking briskly away from a vandalized locker (spraypainted) with paint on his shirt. She is accusing him of spray painting the locker. nobody actually saw the defendant vandalize the locker.
Asked by Dylan - Thu May 14 02:26:59 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Do you know the defendant? Have you ever been acquainted with the defendant. Did you see the defendants shirt before this alleged incident? Do you always take note of peoples clothes? (now go Perry Mason) have a person walk in and turn around that is wearing a sport coat, ask the witness to describe the shirt/blouse that that person is wearing. The defense rests. .
Answered by Lawn Gnome - Thu May 14 02:44:47 2009
How many times can a defendant in a criminal court case ask for a continuance,legally.?
Q. How can I stop a defendant play by normal rules and go to trial. I mean how many times does a defendant get to postpone the enevitable.
Asked by truthpsalms - Fri May 5 12:42:18 2006 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. The Defendant can ask for as many continuances as he/she wants to. Usually, the judge will stop this from going too far when it becomes frivilous. When it becomes silly, ask the judge to stop it and set a date certain for trial, with no further continuances.
Answered by trilium - Fri May 5 12:53:19 2006
Q. How can I stop a defendant play by normal rules and go to trial. I mean how many times does a defendant get to postpone the enevitable.
Asked by truthpsalms - Fri May 5 12:42:18 2006 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. The Defendant can ask for as many continuances as he/she wants to. Usually, the judge will stop this from going too far when it becomes frivilous. When it becomes silly, ask the judge to stop it and set a date certain for trial, with no further continuances.
Answered by trilium - Fri May 5 12:53:19 2006
What will be the procedure to get permanent injunction against the defendant?
Q. Look if I have filed before civil judge certified copy of mcd map which shows that defendant has encroached pon public land and neither MCD nor our honest judge is taking any action against the defendant then what shud I do?
Asked by Jyotsna - Wed Dec 30 04:38:40 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Which country?
Answered by Mu1 - Wed Dec 30 07:15:40 2009
Q. Look if I have filed before civil judge certified copy of mcd map which shows that defendant has encroached pon public land and neither MCD nor our honest judge is taking any action against the defendant then what shud I do?
Asked by Jyotsna - Wed Dec 30 04:38:40 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Which country?
Answered by Mu1 - Wed Dec 30 07:15:40 2009
From Yahoo Answer Search: 'Defendant'
Sat Jul 31 21:49:14 2010 [ refresh local cache ]
[Hide]▼
pennlive.com
Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:38:36 GMT+00:00
sues for back pay, $2 million in damages PennLive.com Stephen Keefer, a defendant acquitted in one of the Bonusgate Pennsylvania legislative corruption trials, wants his state job back and is suing state ... Acquitted in Bonusgate, Keefer sues for job, $2 million Pittsburgh Post Gazette Acquitted Bonusgate staffer files lawsuit Tribune Review
blog.mlive.com
383px x 459px | 251.60kB
[source page]
County legal aid system on trial By Lee Lupo April 28 2007 10 23PM Chronicle Ken StevensPublic defender Holly Baker returns to her desk in court to drop off a file and get a different one for her next case in Muskegon County Circuit Court in front of
blog.9-12bellyard.com
admin
ue, 06 Jul 2010 16:37:58 GM
The age of the case presented interesting challenges in itself, leading to much research about the 1960's and the presentation of evidence of the . Defendant's. life going back over 40 years. Defending the case involved the mounting of ...
[Hide]▲
